Henry Searle vs Matthew Summers Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 11:21 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Searle vs M. Summers

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Searle 1 - 0 Summers
They have played 2 sets in total, with Henry Searle winning 2 and Matthew Summers winning 0. The last match between Henry Searle and Matthew Summers was at the M25 Roehampton, 06-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Henry Searle getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Searle | 1 |
| Summers | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Roehampton(08-06-25)
H. Searle vs M. Summers H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $14,050 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.67% (69-62) | Career Total W/L | 59.20% (103-71) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Searle vs M. Summers Match Preview:
- Second serve performance reveals Searle's slight advantage, winning 46.86% of points, compared to Summers' 45.14%. Could this small edge become a key factor in the match?
- Searle appears stronger in returning second serves, winning 46.69% of points versus Summers' 40.96%. However, Summers outperforms on first serve returns with 27.4% over Searle's 24.88%.
- Under pressure, Searle saves 60.5% of breakpoints, while Summers saves 53.63%, suggesting Searle may handle crucial moments better.
- In the past year, Summers boasts a slightly higher match win percentage at 57.38% compared to Searle's 52.83%.
- Both players excel on hard courts, but Summers has a better win record (61%) than Searle (57%).
- At the Futures level, Searle holds a higher win rate at 64% over Summers' 58.33%, which might impact the match depending on the level of play.
- Summers competes against slightly higher-ranked opponents, with an average opponent rank of 340.9 compared to Searle's 356.64, possibly indicating better experience against tougher competitors.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Summers may have the upper hand, winning 50% versus Searle's 38% in such situations.
- Searle struggles with breakpoint conversion, achieving 24.68% against Summers' 33.72%, potentially affecting key game-changing opportunities. Could this efficiency tip the scales in Summers' favor?
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
Both Searle and Summers demonstrate strengths across various aspects of their games, yet certain components provide Summers a slight edge.
While Searle shows greater prowess in handling second serves and breakpoints, Summers' consistency, experience against higher-ranked opponents, and superior breakpoint conversion rate suggests a more reliable performance.
Given Summers' ability to prevail in deciding sets and his hard court success, he seems primed for victory.
Taking all factors into consideration, Summers is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Henry Searle vs Matthew Summers Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Searle vs M. Summers H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:13:42 | Average Match Time | 1:13:42 |
| 71% (34/48) | 1st Serve % | 79% (38/48) |
| 68% (23/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (16/38) |
| 50% (7/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (3/10) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 60% (29/48) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Searle Recent Matches Played
M. Summers Recent Matches Played

H. Searle vs M. Summers Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.67% (69/62) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.20% (103/71) |
| 53.59% (164/142) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.28% (230/158) |
| 51.47% (1537/1449) | Games Win/Loss | 53.32% (2017/1766) |
| 59.38% (38/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.69% (95/59) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 51.22% (21/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 38.89% (7/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 738 | Aces Total | 266 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 332 | Total Double Faults | 273 |
| 1:40:37 | Average Match Time | 1:13:24 |
| 397.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 294.55 |
| 63% (5775/9104) | 1st Serve % | 67% (5393/8070) |
| 71% (4102/5775) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3582/5393) |
| 53% (1748/3329) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1355/2677) |
| 40% (309/766) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (378/821) |
| 36% (3268/8960) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3364/8126) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.62% (20/22) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 58.75% (47/33) | Futures W/L | 59.54% (103/70) |
| 53% (68/128) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (102/172) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 40% (21/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (30/55) |
| 37% (15/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (16/40) |
| 83% (72/60) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (107/93) |
| 17% (72/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (107/14) |
| 14% (59/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (67/10) |